This is from my firm's website, www.nursingattorney.com:
Nurses always ask what can they do to improve the regulation of their practice by the Texas Board of Nursing. There are questions of how to make the process more fair, especially for those nurses who have never had a violation before and have a wonderful history of nursing practice. Now, nurses can make a difference and ensure that two proposed rules pass; two proposed rules which will benefit nurses in Texas.
All nurses should read the recently proposed changes for the BON's rules sections §213.32, Corrective Action Proceedings and Schedule of Administrative Fines and §213.35, Knowledge, Skills, Training, Assessment and Research (KSTAR) Pilot Program. (22 Texas Administrative Code §213) These rules will help nurses with minor practice violations resulting in disciplinary actions at the level of Remedial Education (§213.32) and at the level of Warning with Stipulations and Remedial Education (§213.35). The levels include with and without a fine.
The Corrective Action Proceeding is non-reportable to the databanks and is not considered a disciplinary action. Previously this option was restricted previously to administrative documentation type cases such as failing to inform the Board of a minor past criminal conviction or a failure to monitor the renewals of nurses under your supervision. Expanding this option to practice issues will help the type of cases in the past where a nurse has a stellar nursing practice history but has made an error of some type; having these nurses put under disciplinary orders was one of the biggest problems facing the Board in my opinion.
Allowing deficiencies in nursing practice to be corrected by the KSTAR program is a great step in the regulation of nurses. The typical Board Order may not have addressed specific issues a nurse had and instead lumped all violations of a certain level into the same remedial courses. The program will not be cheap for the nurse, but if the success is anything like that of other professions who have utilized a KSTAR like program, the program will be successful in preventing recurring Board Orders for additional violations. This program will be reportable and will be a disciplinary action.
Each program has specific requirements and restrictions, but these two proposed rules are something nurses should support. In order to help ensure passage of these rules, read the rules and if you are in support, send a letter to James W. Johnston, General Counsel, Texas Board of Nursing, 333 Guadalupe, Suite 3-460, Austin, Texas 78701, or by e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org, or faxed to (512) 305-8101. An additional copy of the comments on the proposal or any request for a public hearing must be simultaneously submitted to Melinda Hester, RN, Lead Nursing Consultant for Practice, Texas Board of Nursing, 333 Guadalupe, Suite 3-460, Austin, Texas 78701, or by e-mail to email@example.com, or faxed to (512) 305-8101. If a hearing is held, written and oral comments presented at the hearing will be considered.
A public hearing is where the public is allowed to voice their opinions regarding the rule in person before the Board; a hearing is not required for comments to be considered if submitted in writing, to the two staff members above as directed and submitted no later than 5:00 p.m. on June 23, 2014 for §213.32, the Corrective Action Proceeding proposed rule and no later than 5:00 p.m. on July 7, 2014 for §213.35, the KSTAR proposed rule.
Sunday, June 8, 2014
This is from my firm's website, www.nursingattorney.com:
Tuesday, September 24, 2013
If the BON asks a question on application/renewal paperwork, answer the question truthfully. The area which trips up more Texas nurses is the criminal background question. This particular question has undergone multiple changes and refinements based on what the Board heard back from nurses who did not understand the question. When in doubt, answer the question "yes" rather than marking "no". If you have been involved with the Police, arrested, jailed, posted bail, anything associated with the criminal system, you will most likely have to answer yes (the only exception is expungment or nondisclosure orders, see below). The best option is to check with an attorney who is experienced with the Board, not your criminal attorney, not your best friend, not your co-workers or supervisors, and sometimes not even Board staff**.
The nurse should always be careful when submitting a statement regarding criminal offenses. There have been cases where what the nurse submitted as a statement is what got them in trouble with the Board and not the actual conviction. Also, there have been many cases when the nurse fails to inform the Board of a criminal incident and are disciplined for the failure to disclose; if the nurse had informed the Board no action would have taken place which is why the action is based on the failure to disclose only (there are some minor criminal offenses for which the Board will not take disciplinary action).
If you are in nursing school or entering school, do not wait too long to obtain the Board's decision on your criminal incident. It takes a while for the Board to review the multiple applications they receive and a positive criminal background will delay the process. Then you have to wait and calling or writing will not speed the process; hiring an attorney will not speed the process except an experienced attorney can review what you have sent to make sure you provided all required information thereby eliminating that delay; and having your Legislator/Dean/Parent call on your behalf will not speed the process. So, it is better to plan ahead.
**Remember that just like any employer, the Board will have new employees and they may not understand what you are asking or they may be confused to what is required; so if the answer sounds too good to be true, check with an administrative lawyer experienced with the Board.
Expunged offenses, Sealing of Records/Orders of Nondisclosure
First, if you do not have an Order signed by a Judge which states "Order of Expunction/Expungment" or something similar, then get a copy of the Order. If you cannot get a copy of the Judge Order, answer "yes" and state you believe it was expunged. Too often nurses are confused regarding expungments and think there is an Order when in actuality they were eligible for one; or the nurse may confuse a dismissal as a expungment. If you can get a criminal offense expunged, get it done NOW; expunged offenses make the licensure process so much easier.
The same can be said for Order of Nondisclosure or Sealing of Records. The difference is that the board can look at the underlying offense to determine if this action(s) causes concern for the licensing/renewal of a nurse.
Juvenile records are not automatically removed from someone's criminal history, so don't forget these when answering criminal background questions.
Deferred Adjudication, Pretrial diversion
Deferred Adjudication and Pretrial diversion cases are considered convictions by the Board even though in the criminal courts they are not convictions. Be sure to tell the Board about them.
Dismissals, No filing of charges etc.
The Board asks about any ARRESTS, so even though there were no action taken by the criminal court, you still need to tell the Board. Why? There are times when a case is dismissed because it is covered by another criminal charge, but for the Board they want to know about each incident.
If you were arrested, you should have already answered yes, but if that question or the actual outcome question did not catch your attention the pending charges question should. In other words, most of the time you will answer "yes" if you have been involved with the Police/Criminal Court system.
NJP, non judicial punishment by military administration
NJPs are administrative decisions and are not a result of the showing of evidence/witnesses before a Judge or jury; the nurse is just informed of the decision. These are determinations made by the commanding officer. They are not reported to any criminal database since they are non-criminal, administrative decisions. Because of the nature of NJPs, I have argued several times to the Board that these do not belong in the same category as criminal cases and if it were not for the honesty of the nurse the Board would not even know about the NJPs since they typically do not show up on DPS and FBI background checks. However, the board continues to ask for information regarding the NJPs and has taken disciplinary action on a nurse based on what occurred (usually when the facts involve substance abuse issues, positive screens, assault, theft).
It is a Misdemeanor, not a Felony so the BON won't be interested, right? WRONG!! The Board asks about all arrests and convictions, not just felonies. If you have pending charges and the arrest was for a felony, tell your criminal attorney to plead that down to a misdemeanor. Why? If you have a felony conviction (and remember felony deferred adjudications are considered convictions for the Board) the Board takes much harsher action including the potential for revocation, suspension or surrender. Sometimes a plea of guilty to a Class A misdemeanor results in a better outcome for the nurse than a Felony deferred adjudication. It is best to have your criminal attorney speak to your administrative attorney when determining the best plea outcome.
Each case can have unique aspects which require the review by an administrative attorney experienced with the Board. Be proactive and don't wait to get the right advice. I met with a nurse who was going to sign a disciplinary order and only had questions about some of the restrictions proposed by the BON. When I reviewed the Order and the underlying arrest, I informed the nurse that the BON had no statutory support for the imposition of an Order. I wrote a letter to the Board explaining why the Order was not valid and the complaint was quickly closed (the case was being handled by a new investigator who did not know the statute and it was not caught when it went through review). So, I know I harp on getting legal advice by an experienced attorney but I have seen over the years the need for an attorney's involvement and the definite need for an attorney who has experience with the BON and I have seen bad outcomes when the proper advice is not obtained.
Saturday, July 7, 2012
On July 3, 2012 a public hearing was held by the Texas Board of
Nursing regarding the proposed rule changes to 22 Texas Administrative
Code 213.23. The proposed rule changes will significantly alter what an
Administrative Law Judge is able to do when issuing a PFD (proposal for
decision). This has been a hot issue for several years in Texas and
there has been a movement to allow the State Office of Administrative
Hearings Judges be the final decision maker instead of the current
procedure which sends the Judge's PFD to the Board and the Board
determines if they are going to accept the PFD or change it. This
"second bite of the apple" by regulatory agencies causes cries of unjust
and unfair by licensees because a licensee can spend the time and money
to go to a hearing, win and still end up with a disciplinary action if
the Board decides to change the Judge's PFD. The last session of the
Legislature found a bill passing both the House and the Senate only to
have Governor Perry veto the bill. Gov Perry stated he did not believe
the SOAH Judges had the same expertise as the Board members and the end
result should then remain with the Boards. However, the hearing process
allows for the Board to provide its expertise to the Judge just as the
licensee explains their stance. The hearing process would allow for the
Board's policies and procedures to be provided and explained. Judges
are not required to be experts, that is the role of expert witnesses.
Back to the proposed rule changes:
The Texas Chapter of The American Association of Nurse Attorneys had provided written comments on June 18, 2012 and also requested a public hearing. We were not informed of the public meeting but one of our members discovered the scheduled meeting while reviewing the Texas Register. There were 4 speakers commenting on the proposed rules and below are some of the comments made during the meeting:
A public member stated he did not believe the Board really wanted a public hearing because they limited notice of the public hearing and it was scheduled in the afternoon on the day before a major holiday (June 4). [As a note, I also wondered why the Board scheduled the public hearing for such an inconvenient date and why the public hearing was not held during the upcoming July Board meeting. The public hearing was held with only the President of the Board present; no other members were present to hear the comments made in response to the proposed rules] The public member stated he believed this proposed rule will not decrease costs but will actually increase costs due to increased district court cases filed by nurses who feel so wronged by the process. He stated this rule takes away from the right to a fair hearing and could lead to the formation of nursing unions as a means to fight the Board's increased regulation. He said to decrease costs, instead of this rule change the push should be to have the staff move cases and resolve them quicker and the Board should be able to resolve a case within six months.
The Texas Chapter of The American Association of Nurse Attorneys pointed out in addition to their written comments that they believe the NPA requires a Judge to issue sanction recommendations.
The Texas Nurses Association urged the Board to delay any action because they believe the correct venue for deciding a Judge's role in issuing the Proposal for Decision (PFD) is the Legislature and not all the various health care regulatory agencies. They stated there may be an issue with statutory authority. They are concerned prohibiting SOAH Judges from making recommendations would have the potential of removing valuable information needed to determine appropriate sanctions. Finally, they recommended it is probably time for there to be an overall evaluation of SOAH's role by all stakeholders and decide if they are going to be judicial or not.
A defense attorney stated the NPA 301.454 (d) gives SOAH authority and the Judge is bound by the same factors. Also, this proposed rule will put the Board in the position of judging evidence. She stated there is a current system which allows the Board to monitor the application of their policy. Lastly, that there should be an individual approach to discipline because otherwise it is an assembly line approach which removes the need for the specialized Board members and staff.
[This info is also located on healthlicensedefense.com]
Monday, June 18, 2012
It is very important to take the right actions when you are a nurse
with a criminal history or a recent arrest and you are going to have to
inform the BON:
1. Do NOT lie to the Board because this will increase the punishment against you or it may change a criminal incident from a "no action" to a disciplinary action.
2. If you can, immediately get an expungment or at least an Order of Nondisclosure (sealing of the records). I love when a nurse has an expungment because it makes the issue so much more clean and easy to deal with. Even if you can only get an expungment on one of several issues, get it because it decreases the number of issues the Board has to regulate and it helps with employment issues as well.
3. Get advice from an administrative lawyer who represents nurses before the Texas BON; do not rely only upon your criminal attorney. Do not say anything or send anything to the BON without your attorney's approval.
4. Make sure you completely understand the questions the Board is asking on renewal or on an initial application. You must read the questions every time you renew because they change and you cannot answer based on what you answered last renewal because the question could now require a different answer. When considering whether to tell the Board about a criminal incident, arrest etc., see Number 1 above.
5. Do NOT get any type of disposition which is attached to "felony" because receiving a felony in any form, including deferred adjudications which are considered convictions, is a fast way to a revocation of your nursing license. There are times the BON will allow a nurse to retain a license with a felony conviction but those are few and it is better to get the charges reduced to a misdemeanor.
6. When in doubt, follow through with hint number 1 and hint number 3 above.